Tuesday, February 25, 2014

*Review* ELO - The Electric Light Orchestra (No Answer)

*I'm not a professional music connoisseur, and as such everything here is opinion-based and usually made during my first listen to a song / album.*


I’m going to take a break from the regular reviews of The Rolling Stones to take a look at the one art rock band that I personally think tops them all, Electric Light Orchestra. Of course, not all of their stuff is art rock. It’s Symphonic Rock, hard rock, but a lot of their early stuff (post-The Idle Race, although a lot of their stuff was Psychedelic which is a form of art rock at times.) has that beautiful artsy sound.
And Luckily, ELO doesn't have differences (that I can see immediately) between US and UK albums besides their unfortunate name mistakes.

The Electric Light Orchestra (No Answer)

Released
December 1971

10538 Overture

This is a pretty big hit for ELO in the UK, and coming from the first song of their first album no less. No love in the US it seems though. The song uses some beautifully placed Cello love, but keeps the same structure throughout, and repeats most of it’s phrases with changes within the lines of different brass parts. Most people would be so confused to hear such a hard-and-heavy hit that relies of string and brass instruments. My one and only problem is that it perhaps goes on too long, since the song is mostly the same until the end.

8.75 /10



Look At Me Now

This has a strange demo feel, like McCartney’s first album; and by that I mean the vocals seem to have been recorded first, alone, and then the instrumentation was thoughtfully placed around it. Quite a bit of contrast from the hard rock hit from before, but that’s about it.

7/10

Nellie Takes Her Bow

You can really tell the difference between a Lynne composition and a Wood composition so far. Lynne seems to be more about making everything neat, and Roy just does what he thinks I guess. A slower song like Look At Me Now, but that’s exactly what Lynne wants you to think. About 2:20 into the song, we start to change, and that’s the beauty of some of these lesser known ELO song; they’re very much like full orchestra pieces having several movements. The change isn't drastic though, as it’s still slow, but it does take on a violin solo. Also, Lynne adds some sort of vocal effect that I really don’t know if I like or not. I feel like a bit more could have been put into this song, but as is it’s pretty nice with nice backing vocals to accompany everything else. (Also, I thought it was bow, as in violin bow. I mean, try putting the pieces together, it’s EL Orchestra)

7.75 / 10



The Battle of Marston Moor (July 2nd, 1644)

Wikipedia has a nice word to describe this song: Baroque-and-Roll. A Roy composition that is very story-heavy, but at the same time uses the available orchestration to a great extent. He really was going for less of a song and more for a story, and like I said, art. It’s hard not to expect art pieces from a band like this. This is also the longest song on the album, clocking in at just over 6 minutes, and maybe it isn't worth it. Art’s fun and all, but the listeners have to be in it as well. I imagine Roy was very happy making this, because a lot of work goes into things like this, more so than Mick Jagger and his filler albums. It’s a weird piece that has some weird transitions between it’s movements, but it does have that nasty ending note. Nasty in a good way.


6.75 / 10

First Movement (Jumping Biz)

Very interesting. It’s hard to explain all of these pieces, but this is something different. It’s very upbeat, but not too much. It’s like an intro to a movie. I think I enjoy this piece, because it’s fun and short. A song like this wouldn't work long (see the song right before this, although that was more art than this song.)

7.75 / 10

Mr. Radio

No, it’s not Mr. Blue Sky yet. Go away. It can be easily compared to this song though. It’s a combination of Mr. Blue Sky and Telephone Line. It’s a nice, simple story as well, mixed in with some of the most beautiful composed orchestration on the album. But you know, behind the story, and the orchestra, it’s just a good song. Nothing more, nothing less. (Although guilty pleasure to the use of backwards violins at the end)

8/10

Manhattan Rumble (49th Street Massacre)

For a second I thought it was going to start the beginning of The Wall; those piano notes are either exactly the same or close to Outside the Wall. The feeling of the song definitely matches the 49th Street Massacre part, with it’s dark and demanding piano and beating drums and the cellos make their stand. Halfway through the song we get something a bit different, but still manages to keep a dark and creepy atmosphere. Oh, and there’s wind instruments, that’s a bit weird. This song is almost fun, and I actually smiled at around the 3 minute mark when the high-pitched background vocals started (probably for the song reason though). So far, this album really tries its best to be art.

6.75/10

Queen of the Hours

Lynne gets his third written song in a row, and it’s more of what I like. More music and less art, but it’s still pretty much art (but pretend it isn't so I can stop saying the word art for a bit.) Something I’m going to note here is that a lot of the song blend in together, and not in the way that one track overlaps into the other track, but they all start to sound the same (besides 10538 Overture.) That’s not the best thing to do. Nothing much to say about this song except that it has a nice length.

7.5/10



Whisper in the Night

Wood ends this album with something beautiful. We go back to the slow lyrical style of the album with this song, and it’s very lyrical. And one of my #1 guilty pleasures appear on this song, although only for a short amount of time, a slide guitar solo (a soft one). Other than that, though, it’s alright. Very soft, very beautiful, but very much the same as the rest of the album.

8/10



68.25 / 90

In Conclusion



I love ELO, I love Lynne, and as a violin player I love orchestration. I have a great appreciation for everything that was attempted here and their other albums (and Lynne’s producer work on everything from his albums to his fellow Wilburys’ albums.) I would not recommend this album to many people. This is an album for specific tastes, and people who just like ELO. I can forgive them for this being their first album, but both Lynne and Wood has had experience with albums (Wood has four with The Move and a single with Acid Gallery, and Lynne has possibly six with both The Move and The Idle Race.) There’s something here for sure, but is it music? Yes it’s music, of course it’s music. Just not the type of music that will ever be accepted like regular rock.
I'm not saying I'm glad they decided to rock more later, but I'm implying it. I love me some baroque, but maybe not a lot of baroque that wants you to know its baroque. Forced Baroque, perhaps?

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

*Review* (Single) As Tears Go By / Gotta Get Away

*This is part of my ongoing, personal project of listening to every Rolling Stones material released, posted onto this blog for everyone to read and for opinions to flourish. The rating doesn't mean much, because I hate ratings, but might as well.*

(Single) As Tears Go By / Gotta Get Away

As Tears Go By

(Jagger, Richards and Andrew Loog Oldham)
A very beautiful song. Very beautiful indeed. And there’s orchestration to this, and you can’t complain about that. And Jagger doesn’t push his voice, because if he did the song would be ruined.
10/10

Gotta Get Away

(Jagger / Richards)
Somehow a very appropriate B-side. An above-average song from the Stones that doesn’t do too much.
8/10

18/20


Excellent single.  I knew from the start that As Tears Go By would get a single release, as it’s so different and beautiful. The B-side is also good and fits well with the overall tone of the single.

*Review* December’s Children (And Everybody’s)

December’s Children (And Everybody’s)

Released
December 4, 1965

Before we start this one, I’m going to complain about the usage of the album art. It’s the same as the previous UK album Out of Our Heads. I have tons more complaints for this album, but let’s deal with them when they arise.

She Said “Yeah”

(Sonny Bono and Roddy Jackson)
Listen, I have no problem with using the UK tracks, but it’s really annoying that they had to do this in the first place. If everyone got the same album, we wouldn’t need to be reviewing the same songs without it being either a new single or a compilation album. A nice rocking sound from the UK Out of Our Heads.
9/10

Talkin’ About You

(Chuck Berry)
Didn’t like this cover in Out of Our Heads, still don’t really like it. It’s alright.
6/10

You Better Move On

(Arthur Alexander)
Jesus, are we actually reusing UK songs from 1964, technically recording in 1963? For an album almost reaching 1966? Who are we here? You know Stones, you are really lucky I really like this song. Really lucky. Like really, if you’re going to split up the albums to have different songs, why give the other country the songs later on? You’re ruining valuable song space.
9/10 (It used to be 10/10, and it still is, but because it’s on this album that’s what you get)

Look What You’ve Done

(McKinley Morganfield)
The Stones return to their blues rock, and it’s not bad. At this point Jagger is really confident in his voice, either that or new recording equipment makes this sound better than it should. But still, nothing special, and it’s very weird to have this sandwiched into the Stones’ rock age.
7.5/10

The Singer, Not The Song

(Jagger / Richards)
I’m alright with the re-using of this song, since it’s fresh and only a b-side in the UK. Plus, this song works even better as part of an album. So it’s a good song, but nothing great, unfortunately. Maybe it’ll grow on me. I don’t know.
7/10

Route 66

What’s up with them and using already-released live songs on official albums? I don’t like it. Especially when you can hardly hear anything anyway, I mean they had to know that the sound quality isn’t the best, and so when you throw it on a studio album it’s just weird. The performance isn’t as good as it should be, either. Not bad, but not great.
7/10

Get Off of My Cloud

(Jagger / Richards)
(Copied from the song’s single review) While not at the same fame as Satisfaction, it’s still very much up there. It was also written has a follow-up to the song. All lot of the follow-ups fail to live up to their predecessors, but I think this song does a fantastic job. Even under pressure, they managed to write a great song and perform it brilliantly as well.
9.5/10

I’m Free

(Jagger / Richards)
I feel like we’re blessed to have both Get off My Cloud and I’m Free in the same album.
(Copied from the Get Off My Cloud single) Really good song that really works well as the album’s closer. It has a nice feeling to it, and that is probably because it’s not a cover. I can’t really pick anything out of this per se, but the instruments seem to flow well together. The guitar solo isn’t anything to note, but it doesn’t have to be, I feel like a complicated solo would ruin this song.
9/10

As Tears Go By

(Jagger, Richards and Andrew Loog Oldham)
Oh my, this is beautiful. Listen to that orchestra. Listen to that sweet, soft guitar. McCartney’s got some explaining to do.
10/10

Gotta Get Away

(Jagger / RichardS)
Nothing especially complex, but it does get the job done. Instruments slide in nicely together.
8/10

Blue Turns to Grey

(Jagger / Richards)
I don’t know what to say about this song. I appreciate the use of a 12-string guitar on both rhythm and lead parts. It’s a nice song, with very good parts about it, but it feels too generic.
6/10

I’m Moving On

(Hank Snow)
There used two live songs on this. No, stop it. And it’s my least favorite performance from the Got Live If You Want It! EP. Gah.
4/10

92/120


Pretty disappointing album. I think people really enjoy this album, but there’s just nothing really to it for me. The B-side was very dominant here, with some of The Stones excellent work for the time like Get Off My Cloud and As Tears Go By. But, I guess, for an American album who didn’t get most of the songs because of UK exclusives, it’s better than nothing. It's almost impossible today to put in perspective that the Americans did not have the leisure of just going out and buying UK albums, so my opinions on songs I've already heard before might be skewed. Just stop using badly mixed live songs for official studio albums please.

*Review* (Single) Get Off of My Cloud / The Singer Not the Song

*This is part of my ongoing, personal project of listening to every Rolling Stones material released, posted onto this blog for everyone to read and for opinions to flourish. The rating doesn't mean much, because I hate ratings, but might as well.*

Get Off of My Cloud / The Singer Not the Song

Get Off of My Cloud

(Jagger / Richards)
If the UK and the US want to have a different music scene then why do you do this to me. Look at the previous single, released a month before this one, for my actual review of this song.
9.5/10

The Singer Not The Song

(Jagger / Richards)
Eh, a good b-side but not really anything too great about it. The intro started well, but it ends up being the same.
7/10

16.5 / 20

So the B-side for this UK version is not as good as the US version. The UK did get a new b-side entirely, however, so congratulations.


*Review* (Single) Get Off of My Cloud / I'm Free

*This is part of my ongoing, personal project of listening to every Rolling Stones material released, posted onto this blog for everyone to read and for opinions to flourish. The rating doesn't mean much, because I hate ratings, but might as well.*

Get Off of My Cloud / I’m Free

Get Off Of My Cloud

(Jagger / Richards)
While not at the same fame as Satisfaction, it’s still very much up there. It was also written has a follow-up to the song. All lot of the follow-ups fail to live up to their predecessors, but I think this song does a fantastic job. Even under pressure, they managed to write a great song and perform it brilliantly as well.
9.5/10

I’m Free

(Jagger / Richards)
This song would work well as an a-side, but putting it on the B-side is still great. As I said previously about this song, the instruments really flow well together.
9/10

18.5/20


This might be their best single so far. The a-side is exactly what I like to come out of The Stones, and the B-side is a nice song that doesn’t try to impress anyone.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Actual Recording Dates for The Beatles "Anthology 3" (From Get Back Sessions)

So for some reason my favorite #1 source for Beatles Material, The Beatles Bible, are wrong about their recording dates for some songs on Anthology 3 that were recorded on the Get Back Sessions. So I found the correct dates, because I'm insane.

I've Got A Feeling

    Recorded January 22, 1969. (22.69)

She Came In Through The Bathroom Window

    Recorded January 21, 1969. (21.79)

Dig A Pony

    Recorded January 22, 1969. (22.21)

Two Of Us

    Recorded January 24, 1969. (24.30)

For You Blue

    Recorded January 25, 1969 (25.34)

Teddy Boy

    The beginning was recorded on January 28, 1969. (28.83)
    The later portion, including Lennon's "Dosie-do", was recorded on January 24, 1969 (24.33)

Rip It Up / Shake, Rattle and Roll / Blue Suede Shoes

    All three were recorded on January 26, 1969. (26.57) (26.58) (26.60)
  Shake, Rattle and Roll and Blue Suede Shoes weren't played together, as Kansas City, Miss Ann and  Lawdy Miss Clawdy we're played before it in a medley fashion like Kansas City/Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey!.

The Long and Winding Road

    Recorded January 26, 1969. (26.92)

Oh! Darling

    Recorded January 27, 1969. (27.56)

Mailman, Bring Me No More Blues

    Recorded January 29, 1969. (29.53)

Get Back

    Recorded January 30, 1969 (The Rooftop Concert)
All Things Must Pass, the missing track, was recorded (at least to The Beatles Bible, and if it says that, I'm not going to look for it) as a demo sometime in February.
I love Beatles Bible, so I don't mean any disrespect. I just need my information. And information is fun when it involves listening to thousands of takes of Two Of Us. Not really, the whole month of Get Back sessions are depressing but insightful.

Thursday, February 6, 2014

*Partial Review* Out of Our Heads (UK)

Out of Our Heads (UK)

Released
September 24, 1965

I’m going to rate the songs that are different on the album, and then rate the album as a whole, but I’m not going to go over any of the songs on the previously released Out of Our Heads (US).

Additions:

She Said “Yeah”

Whoa, where did this intense track come from? It sounds nice (the ending sounds a bit weird when it just suddenly ends), but we’ll have to see if it can hold up to the track it replaced.
9/10

Gotta Get Away

(Jagger / Richards)
A nice little song, simple yet effective.
8/10

Talkin’ Bout You

(Chuck Berry)
It doesn’t sound as rocking as it should and I’m disappointed.
6/10

Oh, Baby (We Got a Good Thing Going)

(Barbara Lynn Ozen)
This sound sounds more rocking than the Chuck Berry cover, and it works better here than it did on The Rolling Stones, Now!. I don’t like using the word filler, but hey, this might be it. Not as much as Talkin’ Bout You, but still.
7.5/10

Heart of Stone

(Jagger / Richards)
This is a good song with solos that are good as well, as I’ve said back in the 1964 single with B-side What a Shame. I also want to give it something higher than 8.5, but I feel like 8.5 fits this.
8.5/10

I’m Free

(Jagger / Richards)
Really good song that really works well as the album’s closer. It has a nice feeling to it, and that is probably because it’s not a cover. I can’t really pick anything out of this per se, but the instruments seem to flow well together. The guitar solo isn’t anything to note, but it doesn’t have to be, I feel like a complicated solo would ruin this song.
9/10

Subtractions

The Last Time

Unfortunately this song didn’t make the cut. It’s a shame, because I actually like this song a bit.

I’m Alright

Good, this song didn’t belong. It’s alright (pun not intended), but I definitely won’t miss it.

(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction

Removing this song from the lineup quite possibly put a dent into the record itself. I feel like when the kids in UK caught word that the American’s got this song on their record, and they didn’t, they were angry. This was, and still is, a pretty popular song among radio and everything else.

Play With Fire

Another good song that was replaced. While not my favorite, it’s still a beautiful song.

The Spider and the Fly

I don’t necessarily care where this one goes. I’m very split about if I like this or not, but my feeling point to “I kinda don’t like it, but not enough to actually say I don’t like it.” But still, people do like this song, so removing this song didn’t help.

One More Try

I like I’m Free better for a couple reasons, one for the style of the song and another for how it doesn’t fade out.

95 / 120


Amazing. That really is just simply amazing. My score for the UK version is the same as the US version. To producer Andrew Loog Oldham (who produced both versions), bravo, you’ve managed to take out the important singles and still manage a 95. You deserve a lot of credit. Anyway, I personally thought the album was a tiny bit weaker than the US version if just for the exclusion of the popular singles. The reason for this is the UK music industry didn’t like to use popular singles on their albums, which is reasonable but at the same time could hurt an album if you don’t fit the album with right replacements. All in all, Mr. Oldham is fantastic and we should all appreciate him. 

*Review* (Single) (I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction / The Spider and the Fly

*This is part of my ongoing, personal project of listening to every Rolling Stones material released, posted onto this blog for everyone to read and for opinions to flourish. The rating doesn't mean much, because I hate ratings, but might as well.*

17/20


I’ve already went over both songs, so I thought it was a bit pointless to go over them again. Of course Satisfaction is one of The Stones’ crown jewels, and a lot of people like The Spider and the Fly, so that’s good for them. I like The Under Assistant West Coast Promotion Man better as a b-side, but I guess if you were going to pick another break-out song from Out of Our Heads it would be The Spider and the Fly. So overall, great single, but I personally like Satisfaction's original single.

You might want to check out both Satisfaction's original review and Spider and the Fly's review.

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

*Review* Out of Our Heads (US)

Out Of Our Heads (US)

Released
July 30, 1965

Mercy Mercy

(Don Covay and Ronnie Miller)
So everything they’ve done to this song I agree with. The guitar is strong and Jagger’s voice fits perfectly. Not only does it fit, but he seems to be more confident with his voice. For the overall song, it’s a great rocking song that is hopefully a great opener to an equally great album.
9/10

Hitch Hike

(Marvin Gaye, Clarence Paul, Mickey Stevenson)
They have to stop using songs from recording sessions a year earlier, or at least that’s what it sounds like. A nice song, although I can’t say much about it. Songs like these, however, make me really appreciate Charlie Watts, which is something I wasn’t really expecting to come out of this.
7.5/10

The Last Time

(Jagger / Richards)
This was a single, with B-side Play with Fire. I still stand by everything I’ve said in the single review. To sum it up: It sounds The Monkees could play it, great song, Jagger works here, guitar solo was alright.
8.5/10

That’s How Strong My Love Is

(Roosevelt Jamison)
Jagger is pretty strong here. When you mix Soul with this rock sound the Rolling Stones are good at, it makes for a good combination. My only problem is not with The Stones themselves, but the guitar is too loud and covers Jagger’s voice at the end. Even if that was intended, I don’t like it.
8/10

Good Times

(Sam Cooke)
A good cover, but it’s almost funny to hear The Stones cover this. It works, but I just didn’t really expect it. Also, there seems to be a female backup vocalist on here, but none is credited.
7/10

I’m Alright

(Nanker Phelge)
Pretty weird choice to use a live song on an official album. But now I get to rate it, as the Got Live If You Want It! EP was pretty much un-ratable because of the overall album. Sure there’s energy, and sure there’s a fun yet simple bass, but that’s about it. I just don’t know if I like the song’s inclusion on tis album. Alright. Alright. Alright.
7/10

(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction

(Jagger / Richards)
Girl reaction.
10/10

Cry to Me

(Bert Russell)
This is a bit of Soul/Blues Stones trying to escape, buried beneath layers of Rock. It’s a nice guitar, but I can’t really say much for anything else. Jagger’s voice works here better than most of his normal attempt of blues, but meh.
7/10

The Under Assistant West Coast Promotion Man

(Nanker Phelge)
A fun song that doesn’t bring much to the table, but it’s good.
8.5/10

Play With Fire

(Nanker Phelge)
So I’ve heard better slower songs in this style from the Stones. It’s good. Not fantastic, though. Just good. But high score because of its niceness.
8/10

The Spider and The Fly

(Jagger / Richards)
Huh. Blues Rock. I want to like this song, but Jagger kinda pushes me away from this. But this might be the Stones best attempt at a blues song.
7/10

One More Try

Nice ending to the album. But that’s about it, since it wouldn’t make sense anywhere else.
7.5/10

95 / 120


Pretty good album as they slide out of their soul-blues skin, which might be their album so far. While certain songs really shine, others are forgettable.

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

*Review* Aftermath (1966)


Aftermath

Released
April 15, 1966

JP died, and I am Sean


I warn you, I say filler and compliment the instrumentation a lot in this review, just sayin’


1. Mother’s Little Helper
Here are one of the few songs where The Stones sound “cool”
Its dark, real, and overall has a nice texture with the guitar feedback and the sickly little riff. Really nice, and a good way to start the album


2. Stupid Girl
Aftermath is really a shining example of what Brian Jones’s contributed to the album.A nice little sexist ditty, Stupid Girl is repetitive but it has a nice flow and the organ makes this song stick out.  


3. Lady Jane
This little b-side is one of my favorite songs from The Rolling Stones. It has a flowing sincerity to it that should not be there, but you can feel it, or at least I can.Richard’s subdued guitar Brian Jones and his little dulcimer, form a really solid base, while Jagger’s voice along with the harpsichord make this song stand out from the rest of the catalog


4. Under My Thumb
Oh, oh damn, this song, its a perfect little jam. Seriously, everything about this song works, and it does it in such a tight manner. The marabias (Jones being awesome), the piano mixed with acoustic, the drums, the distorted guitar and bass, and then you add Jagger and his little coughing sounds, and you can feel the flow of the melody.
Side note, most live versions of this song are a tad disappointing for me, no marambias, and the song is reduced a bit, but the Almount version is a nice slow jam.


5. Doncha Bother Me
Nothing much to the song, except the nice drums and great slide guitar.


6. Going Home
Oh, sweet Jesus why did this have to be 11 minutes long?
The song is nice but it seems like they only made it so long as to kill album space. I mean, this is the first album where Jagger and Richards wrote everything. While the song drones on, it makes for good background music. Seriously, what the hell?


7.Flight Of 505
Besides sounding like the title of a Twilight Zone song, this song is pretty unremarkable. Ian Stewart’s piano is nice though


8.High And Dry
While I consider this song as filler,(like the last 3 songs) it is complemented by the nice guitar picking, sweet bass, and a good harmonica to fill in the sound. Say what you want about the Stones, but they are very competent musicians


9.Out Of Time
Whoa, marimbas and organ, oh this song is already good from the start. With a swelling chorus, loaded piano, this song gets it right on the dot, I miss when The Stones were a great pop band.


10.It’s Not Easy
Alright, this is where the filler train starts up again. For me, most Rolling Stones albums contain insincere filler, but that is the thing I love about Aftermath, the filler is always serviceable.


11.I Am Waiting
A nice little pleasant song, very soft. Good guitar picking, good dulcimer action, good stuff.


12.Take It Or Leave It
I know this song is filler, but I have a soft spot for it. I think its the chorus, and Jagger’s dictation of the lyrics.Also I can relate to the lyrics, which is hard for a Stones song.


13. Think
Oh yeah, I love the fuzz of the guitars on this track. A nice little song that I also hold close.


14. What To Do
I can’t stop thinking of the Buddy Holly song when I hear this. Again, filler, but good filler. Potato chip like filler


Aftermath represents the forgotten part of the stones, the era where they were a damn fine pop band. With catchy hooks and choruses, and excellent instrumentation by Brian Jones, Aftermath remains one of the best Rolling Stones albums  


*Review* (EP) Got Live If You Want It!

Got Live If You Want It! (EP)

Released
June 11, 1965

We Want The Stones

(Nanker Phelge)
Why is this credited to Nanker Phelge.  We just won’t count this.

Everybody Needs Somebody To Love

(Solomon Burke, Jerry Wexler and Bert Russell)
This is where Stones are pissing me off. It’s already hard enough to rate live albums, but then not only do you include the cheers as a separate track, but this song is only 36 seconds long. Do I even rate this? No. No I don’t. But we get our first taste of the mixing on this album; below-average, but pretty good for a mid-60’s popular rock band.

Pain in My Heart

(Naomi Neville)
So this song sounds a lot better live. Not only that, but it’s performed exceptionally well, despite the Jagger voice crack (I think that’s what it was, you can hardly tell under such harsh crowd conditions, especially when the instruments are louder than the vocals.)

Route 66

(Bobby Troup)
Of course Rock and Roll sounds good live. You’re silly. It’s a good performance, but I feel like they could do better. I’m glad Keith Richards (?) can keep a good solo live as well.

I’m Moving On

(Hank Snow)
So I didn’t like this, sorry. Jagger didn’t really sound that good until the end. Nice drums though, so good job Watts.

I’m Alright

(Jagger / Richards) or (Nanker Phelge)
Better than I’m Moving On as it has some good energy and a nice outro guitar there. Alright. Alright. Alright.
So no ratings because the beginning of this EP screwed that up. Instead I’ll just explain what/how I liked it. Performance wise it was good. Recording wise it was pretty good for the time, but you could’ve had a better mix. This album’s main attraction is the amount of energy these songs radiate out. It’s true that it sounds like a rocking band, and the crowd (like all crowds next to groups in the 60’s) sure enjoyed it, but the songs itself aren’t that great. I mean, they are good, just not great. It’s the energy that carries this album.


*Review* (Single) (I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction / The Under Assistant West Coast Promotion Man

*This is part of my ongoing, personal project of listening to every Rolling Stones material released, posted onto this blog for everyone to read and for opinions to flourish. The rating doesn't mean much, because I hate ratings, but might as well.*

(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction / The Under Assistant West Coast Promotion Man

(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction

(Jagger / Richards)
I’m not going to pretend I’ve never heard this song before. Also, I guess this marks the era of Stones that get major radio play. But the song has a nice drum part and guitar and vocals that aren’t too demanding, but fun. I’m also going to disregard the fact this song is overplayed.
10/10

The Under Assistant West Coast Promotion Man

(Nanker Phelge)
Interesting little piece with harmonica, giving it a blues feel while keeping a fast tempo. Understandably buried underneath the success of Satisfaction, this doesn’t bring too much to the table but is a good song never less.  
8.5/10

18.5 / 20


So fantastic single. It’s really hard to review a song that’s had its guts dissected and reviewed countless times. So I’ll just say that the a-side is fantastic, and the b-side is fantastic for a b-side. 

*Review* (Single) The Last Time / Play with Fire

*This is part of my ongoing, personal project of listening to every Rolling Stones material released, posted onto this blog for everyone to read and for opinions to flourish. The rating doesn't mean much, because I hate ratings, but might as well.*

The Last Time / Play with Fire

The Last Time

(Jagger/Richards)
So my first thoughts on this was “I can see The Monkees doing this song.” Weird. Great song, and no wonder; we’re getting really close to the popular era of The Rolling Stones. While I didn't care much about the guitar solo, the rest was pretty good. Jagger has found where his voice needs to be.
8.5/10

Play with Fire

So I've heard better slower songs in this style from the Stones. It’s good. Not fantastic, though. Just good. But high score because of its niceness.
8/10

16.5/20


So great single, both sides hold up well. I really can’t think of anything else to say, and I've been holding onto this review for a week.