Showing posts with label Mona. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mona. Show all posts

Friday, January 24, 2014

*Kinda-Review* The Rolling Stones, Now!

The Rolling Stones, Now!

Released
February 13, 1965

The American version of The Rolling Stones No. 2. Instead of rating it’s songs again, I’m going to talk about its replacements. So if you really want to see a review of this, go see the UK album.

Everybody Needs Somebody to Love

So while not a replacement, this version of the song is two minutes shorter. Unfortunately, for some reason my version of The Rolling Stones No. 2 also has the three minute version, so I can’t really compare it.

Heart of Stone vs. Time Is on My Side

Oh, that’s a tough one. Both songs are fantastic, and both are kinda slow. I’ll say this; there’s no reason to hate the decision. Both songs were released in the United States as singles, so you’re not really getting any new songs either way. I think both songs pretty much match each other in terms of quality and music, so while I can’t say “good on you for changing that,” it definitely doesn’t hurt.

Mona (I Need You Baby) vs. Grown Up Wrong

Very weird decision, but I guess America did never actually get Mona from England’s Newest Hit Makers. However, Grown Up Wrong is a bit better and fits the Rolling Stones at this point in their career, because it was recorded at this point in their career. So bad choice here, but not too bad.

Oh Baby (We Got a Good Thing Goin') vs. Under the Boardwalk

A new song? Anything is better than Under the Boardwalk, and this sounds good.

Little Red Rooster vs. I Can’t Be Satisfied

I like I Can’t Be Satisfied a lot better. A lot better.

Surprise, Surprise vs. Suzie Q

Another new song. Honestly I didn’t even realize there were new songs on here until I started this review. I’m under a lot of stress right now with my carbon dioxide alarm going off for no reason every 5 minutes, so I’m not going to rate it. I appreciate the Stones using a longer song for the ending, and while Surprise, Surprise is a good song, Suzie Q wins by a small amount. Because I like the guitar better. Although Surprise, Surprise’s vocals are pretty good. I guess they’re evenly matched.



Overall, I guess I like the American version better. I just wished they could’ve found a way to keep Time is On My Side and still include Heart of Stone. But if I was rating this, it would definitely be a bit better than The Rolling Stones No. 2.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

The Rolling Stones (Album)

The Rolling Stones

Released
April 16, 1964

Route 66

(Bobby Troup)
So here we start, at Route 66. Nice guitar work by whatever guitarist picked this up. Jagger’s voice works well in the Rock and Roll scene. All together it’s a nice cover.
3.5/5

I Just Want To Make Love To You

(Willie Dixon)
Some more good guitar work by either Brian or Keith (Wiki says Keith), although I can’t say the same for Jagger’s vocal work. It’s a decent cover, but nothing special.
3 / 5

Honest I Do

(Jimmy Reed)
These blues numbers are a lot better than I remember them being. Maybe it’s the remastering’s doing. Very short, which is weird considering Reed’s original goes for about three minutes. Maybe it was better short.
2.5/5

Mona

(Ellas McDaniel)
Also known as I Need You Baby, I think. Good shaker or maraca work by whoever, but mostly generic that I think blends in with other attempts at R&B.
2.5/5

Now I’ve Got A Witness

(Nanker Phelge)
Ian Stewart’s organ and whoever’s harmonica (could be Jagger, could be Jones) works really well together. That could be because I really like the sound of a good organ. The solo at the end also sounds nice.
4/5

Little By Little

(Nanker Phelge and Phil Spector)
A good rocking tune. I thought the song was going to be dominated by Jagger’s vocals, but once his harmonica solo ended it was a good mix of instruments and vocals. But honestly, in the end it’s nothing special.
3.5/5

I’m a King Bee

(Slim Harpo)
I can’t tell if that’s a bass or a rhythm guitar doing that slide up, but it sounds good. Jagger’s voice work is a bit under par on this song, unfortunately, but nothing too bad.
3/5

Carol

(Chuck Berry)
Guitar work is great, I just don’t think Jagger’s voice can replace Chuck Berry’s. I appreciate their choice to cover Carol instead of something that’s been covered more, like Roll Over Beethoven. It’s different, and that’s what you need to succeed.  In the end, it’s a really good cover, but I don’t feel comfortable giving it a 4, and that’s the main flaw of having 5 numbers to choose from.
3.75/5

Tell Me (You’re Coming Back)

(Mick Jagger and Keith Richards)
The only song on the album that isn’t a cover. I want to like this song, and I feel like if I listen to it some more I can appreciate it. But here’s my reason for not liking it as much as I want to. I appreciate it when The Rolling Stones do harmonies, they seem to go well with the voice of Jagger. But I didn't like how they harmonized together on this. It also cuts off, which was a bit weird. It’s a well written song, however that just doesn't do quite enough in my opinion. But like I said, this feels like a good song that might become great over time.
4/5

Can I Get a Witness

(Brian Holland, Lamond Dozier and Eddie Holland)
I don’t like how Jagger sounds on this, and the rest is average.
2.5/5

You Can Make It If You Try

(Ted Jarrett)
Average song. Nothing special, and that’s even with an organ backing it up.
2.5/5

Walking the Dog

(Rufus Thomas)
I don’t know what The Stones thought they were doing cover this. Whoever is doing backing vocals seems to have the right attitude, but Jagger doesn't have the right voice for this. And it almost sounds calm (excluding the solo, which is nice), which is the last thing this song should be. But I will forgive them this time as the guitar work is nice, even if Jagger doesn't have enough “umph” to do it.

3/5

12 songs, total rating of 5.
37.75 / 60

Overall average album. You can’t ask for too much on a debut album, and I think this fulfills everything The Rolling Stones could’ve done. Guitar solos and guitar work in general if fantastic, featuring full sound. What kept me away from The Stones for so long, Jagger’s voice, is very hit and miss on the album. He tries to put his unique voice into situations where it doesn't belong (example, Walking the Dog). The whole album would be a 3.6 in my book, with 3 I guess being OK/average and 4 being great. And 5, I guess, being fantastic life changing and perfect. (This was the first album I "reviewed", and I realized a 5 needs to be 10 times more lenient)